Photo Courtesy of Unsplash (Adam Szuscik)
Former President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama have expressed their disappointment in the recent Supreme Court ruling that gutted affirmative action, highlighting the impact this decision will have on marginalized communities.
The ruling, which struck down the use of race-conscious admissions policies at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, has sparked a heated debate about the future of diversity in higher education.
Michelle Obama, who has often spoken about her own experiences with affirmative action, shared her concerns for young people who may now question their future and the chances that will be available to them. She recounted the doubts and shadows that students from underrepresented backgrounds, including herself, have faced regarding their admission to elite institutions.
“Back in college, I was one of the few Black students on my campus, and I was proud of getting into such a respected school. I knew I’d worked hard for it. But still, I sometimes wondered if people thought I got there because of affirmative action. It was a shadow that students like me couldn’t shake, whether those doubts came from the outside or inside our own minds…But the fact is this: I belonged,” Michelle wrote.
“So today, my heart breaks for any young person out there who’s wondering what their future holds — and what kinds of chances will be open to them. And while I know the strength and grit that lies inside kids who have always had to sweat a little more to climb the same ladders, I hope and I pray that the rest of us are willing to sweat a little, too. Today is a reminder that we’ve got to do the work not just to enact policies that reflect our values of equity and fairness, but to truly make those values real in all of our schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods,” her statement concludes.
Barack Obama, the nation’s first and only Black president, acknowledged that while affirmative action was not a complete solution to achieving a more just society, it provided generations of students who had been systematically excluded from key institutions with the opportunity to prove their worth. He emphasized the need to redouble efforts in the wake of the court’s decision to ensure that young people from marginalized backgrounds continue to have access to educational opportunities.
“Like any policy, affirmative action wasn’t perfect. But it allowed generations of students like Michelle and me to prove we belonged. Now it’s up to all of us to give young people the opportunities they deserve — and help students everywhere benefit from new perspectives,” Obama added in a statement.
The Obamas’ statements reflect the historic enormity of the 6-3 ruling and the impact it will have on the pursuit of racial justice. However, conservatives have praised the decision, arguing that race-conscious admissions policies discriminate against white and Asian American applicants. On the other hand, Democrats and civil rights groups warn that ending such policies will exacerbate inequality and hinder progress towards a more equitable society.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the conservative majority, declared that eliminating racial discrimination required the elimination of all race-conscious policies. The decision has cast doubt on the legality of admissions programs that use race as one factor among many to promote a diverse student body.
Education and civil rights groups fear that ending these policies will lead to even greater inequality, citing examples of public institutions in states where affirmative action has already been banned struggling to enroll diverse freshman classes.
Related Story: Sex Trafficking Victim, Chrystul Kizer May Be Acquitted of Crimes By Using ‘Affirmative Defense’ Appeal
While the Supreme Court ruling did not explicitly overturn previous cases upholding the limited use of affirmative action, the majority opinion rendered them ineffective in practice. Justice Clarence Thomas, who joined Roberts’ opinion, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who dissented, both suggested that the decision effectively overturned prior cases without explicitly stating so.
Sotomayor, in her dissent, emphasized that the decision closed the door of opportunity for young students of every race and perpetuated an endemically segregated society where race continues to matter. She argued that the court’s majority had embraced a superficial rule of colorblindness that failed to acknowledge the ongoing impact of racism.
Sotomayor added that the ruling’s interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment is
“grounded in the illusion that racial inequality was a problem of a different generation.”Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also dissented, defending race-conscious practices in college admissions as a necessary remedy for past and ongoing discrimination.
“With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces ‘colorblindness for all’ by legal fiat,” the dissent reads. “But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life. And having so detached itself from this country’s actual past and present experiences, the Court has now been lured into interfering with the crucial work that UNC and other institutions of higher learning are doing to solve America’s real-world problems.”
The Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action raises concerns about the future of diversity in higher education. The decision has significant implications for marginalized communities, who have historically been denied equal opportunities. It is crucial for society to continue working towards policies and practices that promote equity, fairness, and inclusion in all aspects of education and beyond.