Photo Courtesy of Piron Guillaume/ Unsplash
In the world of healthcare, where the pursuit of excellence should be color-blind, a controversial program is making headlines for all the wrong reasons.
Vituity, a prominent national physicians group, is facing a legal battle over its “Bridge to Brilliance Program,” which offers a jaw-dropping $100,000 bonus to physicians. Sounds great, right? Well, there’s a catch – it’s only open to Black applicants.
In a move that has sparked outrage and divided opinions, the doctors’ group Do No Harm has filed a lawsuit against Vituity, accusing the organization of racial discrimination in violation of federal law.
Dr. Stanley Goldfarb, the board chair of Do No Harm, emphasized, “Black patients want the best doctors and the best medical care – not doctors that are racially concordant.”
Vituity, however, defends its program, claiming that it aims to “bridge the gaps in access and opportunities in healthcare for historically marginalized communities.”
According to the organization, their “DEI/Health Equity team” leads this initiative, which is centered on “diversity, equity, and inclusion.” While Vituity stands by its program, it faces an uphill legal battle as it navigates the complexities of the law.
Related Story: Delta Air Lines Implementing $200 Monthly Insurance Fee For COVID-19 Unvaccinated Staff
The lawsuit alleges that Vituity’s $100,000 signing bonus for its program is “much higher” than normal signing bonuses and that non-Black physicians are ineligible to apply. This, according to the suit, results in a discriminatory practice.
The lawsuit invokes Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act, which protects the right to make and enforce contracts without respect to race. It also alleges violations of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act, which prohibits discrimination in any health program receiving federal financial assistance.
Interestingly, the lawsuit references a recent Supreme Court case, Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. Harvard, which declared affirmative action in college admissions illegal. The lawsuit highlights the universal nature of the issue, quoting the Supreme Court’s assertion that “racial discrimination is invidious in all contexts.”
This legal battle raises essential questions about the direction of healthcare incentives and diversity initiatives. Do No Harm’s lawsuit sends a clear message that medical professionals should be hired based on merit alone, without any considerations of race.
As this case unfolds in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, it’s apparent that the outcome could have far-reaching implications for healthcare and the fight against discrimination.